Visibility basicsWhy it's easier to get found in Norway than in the Netherlands

Per head of population there's far less text in Norwegian on the web than there is in Dutch. That makes the bar for becoming a credible source in Norway lower right now than it is in the Netherlands. The gap is bigger than population alone explains, and it's temporary.

I work in both markets, and help companies with marketing localization between Dutch, English and Norwegian. Below are the figures that show the gap, the things I see in practice that you won't find in any report, and what to actually do about it.

The Netherlands and Norway side by side

Two prosperous northern European countries that look alike on paper. On the points that matter for getting found, they diverge.

Sources: W3Techs (20 September 2026) for the language share, EF English Proficiency Index 2025 for English, and Google's availability page for AI Overviews. The two e-commerce figures come from different measurements and so aren't exactly comparable. Speaker counts are approximate.
MeasureNetherlandsNorway
Share of all websites in this language2.1%0.2% (Bokmål)
Speakers, approximately~25 million~5.4 million
E-commerce as a share of retail18.3%10–15%
English (EF EPI 2025)1st, 624 points5th, 613 points
AI Overviews availableyesyes

The rest of this article is about what those differences mean in practice, and about one difference that fits in no table at all: how trustworthy the information you find on this subject is in each market.

How much less Norwegian text is there online?

About ten times less than Dutch. W3Techs measures continuously which language websites are written in.

W3Techs, measured 20 September 2026: share of all websites whose language is known. The last column is derived from those percentages. Because 0.2% is rounded, those ratios are indicative: for Dutch the factor sits somewhere between eight and fourteen.
LanguageShare of all websitesHow much more than Norwegian
English49.5%~248x
German5.9%~30x
Dutch2.1%~11x
Swedish0.5%~2.5x
Danish0.4%~2x
Norwegian (Bokmål)0.2%1x
Norwegian (Nynorsk)less than 0.1%less than 0.5x

On its own that says little: Norway is simply a small country. It gets interesting when you set it against the number of speakers.

Dutch has roughly 25 million speakers, Norwegian roughly 5.4 million. That's a ratio of about 4.6 to 1. But in web content the ratio is about 10 to 1. So Norwegian is roughly twice as underrepresented online as its speaker numbers explain.

Two caveats, because they matter. That 0.2% is a rounded figure, so the real ratio sits somewhere between eight and fourteen. And how many speakers a language has depends on whether you count Flanders and Suriname. Neither changes the direction; both change the exact factor.

Why this matters: search engines and AI answers draw on what exists. For a Norwegian question there are simply fewer sources to pick from. The same effort returns more in Norwegian than in Dutch, because you're competing with fewer others for the same spot.

Source: W3Techs, usage statistics of content languages.

But don't Norwegians just search in English?

I hear that argument a lot, and it doesn't hold up, because it applies to the Netherlands just as much.

In the EF English Proficiency Index for 2025 the Netherlands ranks 1st with 624 points, ahead of Norway in 5th with 613. By that index the Dutch are marginally better at English than Norwegians. If a high level of English were the reason not to bother with the local language, the argument would apply to the Netherlands first. It doesn't.

What I should say honestly: I couldn't find a reliable source publishing what share of searches in Norway are typed in English. Those figures aren't public. If somebody hands you such a percentage, it's estimated or invented.

What you do know: the closer somebody is to a purchase, the more often it happens in their own language. Somebody researching a technical subject reads English easily. Somebody looking for a supplier nearby does it in Norwegian.

Which language you use where, and how far you take it, is exactly the judgement I make under marketing localization.

Source: EF English Proficiency Index.

How differently does Norway buy?

This is the part you don't get out of a tool. The Netherlands and Norway look alike on paper, two prosperous northern European countries, but they buy differently.

Buying online is less established in Norway. In the Netherlands about 18.3% of total retail now happens online, above the European average of 14.7%. For Norway the estimates land at 10 to 15%. Those two figures don't come from the same measurement and so aren't exactly comparable, but the direction is clear and it matches what I see: the Norwegian market is growing online, yet the shop is still often where it ends.

In Norway I more often see a deliberate preference for something from their own country. A product made in Norway, or a service from a Norwegian supplier, gets preference sooner. I notice that more strongly than in the Netherlands. So a foreign supplier starts with a disadvantage that's easy to underestimate from a Dutch perspective. A Norwegian address, a Norwegian phone number, Norwegian text that doesn't read as translated and a visible Norwegian presence aren't details.

What I see in the Netherlands is comparison; in Norway the time goes into trust first. Dutch buyers put prices side by side and switch to somebody else easily. With Norwegian clients more time goes into whether you can be trusted. Once that's settled, things move faster.

In practice that means something concrete: in Norway getting found is more often the run-up to a shop visit or a phone call than to an order. Your Google Business Profile, your opening hours, your visibility in Maps and how reachable you are count for more there than a perfectly optimized product page. Copy a Dutch e-commerce approach into Norway unchanged and you're optimizing for the wrong outcome.

Sources: e-commerce statistics 2026 for the Netherlands and the European average, ECDB for Norway. The rest of this section is what I run into on assignments in both markets, not research.

Considering the move into Norway? Send me your website and I'll tell you what genuinely has to change before you have anything translated.

Email me your question

Which review platforms count in Norway?

Trustpilot and the platforms specific to your own industry. You collect Google reviews too, but in Norway they carry less weight as a trust signal than Dutch marketers expect.

That last part is the easiest thing to miss in this whole comparison. In the Netherlands a strong Google profile is often enough social proof. In Norway I see people look further: at Trustpilot, at a platform specific to your trade, and at what's being said about you on social media.

That doesn't mean you can leave Google reviews alone. They still feed your Business Profile, your place in Maps and what Google shows about you. The point is that in Norway they carry the trust less on their own. Use them, but don't lean on them as your only evidence.

Social media plays a bigger part in daily life in Norway, and so in buying behavior too. Facebook is still in wide use there, while it has largely lost that position in the Netherlands. So an active page with recent, real responses does more for your credibility in Norway than many companies assume.

There's a Norwegian review platform as well, NorskeAnmeldelser. Don't expect too much of it: it reports over 10,000 reviews across more than 1,000 businesses and is part of an international network running in more than twenty countries. That's small next to Trustpilot. Being present costs little, but this isn't where the weight sits.

If you come across advice to get certified for Trygg e-handel, the Norwegian trust mark for online stores: it looks like it no longer exists. The certification page returns a 404 and the site now sits on an archive address. A Norwegian e-commerce publication reports it closed on 1 February 2025. I couldn't get that confirmed by Virke itself, so treat the date with caution. Either way, don't assume you can still apply for it.

This is what I see on Norwegian assignments, not research. Use it as direction, not as measurement.
PlatformRole in the Norwegian market
TrustpilotLarge, and often the first place somebody looks
Industry-specific platformsLarge, and which ones varies by trade
Google reviewsPresent, but less decisive than you would expect from the Netherlands
Meta (Facebook, Instagram)Large; Facebook is still in wide use there
NorskeAnmeldelserSmall, but Norwegian
Trygg e-handelA trust mark that no longer seems to exist

For AI answers all of this counts double: what other people write about you is one of the few things that doesn't come from you. Ask for it actively, respond to it, and watch above all how recent it is. One specific story from last month does more than twenty old lines.

Bokmål or Nynorsk, and which language code?

Norwegian has two official written standards. For commercial text you pick Bokmål in practice, because that's what the great majority of Norwegians read and write. But there's a technical side to this that almost never gets discussed.

Språkrådet, the Norwegian Language Council, writes two things that bear on this directly. First, that multilingual datasets mostly don't distinguish between Bokmål and Nynorsk: "Dei fleirspråklege datasetta skil stort sett ikkje mellom bokmål og nynorsk." Second, that the language codes themselves get used carelessly: "Ver merksame på at språkkodane no, nb og nn ikkje vert brukte på ein konsekvent måte."

What you do with that: pick one code and use it consistently everywhere, in your lang attribute, in your hreflang and in your sitemap. For Bokmål that's nb. Don't alternate between no and nb across pages, because then a system has to guess what you mean, and guessing is exactly what you want to avoid when there's already little Norwegian material to compare you against.

What I'm not claiming here: that Nynorsk pages rank worse. It gets said, I couldn't find a source for it, and so I'm leaving it as an open question.

Decisions like this belong under marketing localization. It's rarely only about whether the words are right.

Source: Språkrådet on access to language data.

In Norway you have to read more critically

This is the difference between the two markets that struck me most, and it isn't about language.

In the Netherlands people test and publish. In May 2026 Frankwatching ran a GEO experiment by Rick Zuidbroek in which organic performance at twenty companies was set against their server logs. At one site organic traffic dropped 70% because of a programming error, and visits from ChatGPT-User halved along with it. The conclusion, in Dutch: "zodra de organische vindbaarheid in Google instortte, daalde ook het aantal crawls door ChatGPT-User drastisch."

Twenty companies is small, correlation isn't cause, and a crawl isn't a citation. But there's a name on it, there's a method with it, and it points the same way as everything else: AI visibility leans on ordinary search visibility.

Search for the same subject in Norwegian and the most visible "research" is a Norwegian AI visibility report that turns out, on clicking through, to be an agency's service page. It talks about more than 200 Norwegian AI searches analyzed and five factors AI supposedly selects on, with no account of the sample and no evidence for those five factors.

I don't raise that to run down a competitor. I raise it because it says something about the market: in the Netherlands you can build on published practical tests, in Norway barely yet. That's exactly why the bar for becoming a credible source there is low right now, and why it won't stay that way.

Source: Frankwatching, GEO experiment, 8 May 2026.

What do you do with this?

If you already work in the Netherlands and are considering Norway, this is the order I'd keep to.

  • Don't translate your Dutch site. A translation that reads well still doesn't sell. The assumptions underneath differ: less buying online, more trust needed up front, a stronger preference for Norwegian.
  • Make sure you're visible in Norway first. Business Profile, address, phone number, opening hours, reviews. In a market where the purchase often ends offline, that's not a side issue.
  • Pick Bokmål and one language code, and keep it the same everywhere.
  • Write about subjects that have no good Norwegian answer yet. Search your question in Norwegian and see what comes back. If it's thin, that's your opening.
  • Check what you read. Click through to the source before you repeat a figure. In the Norwegian market, remarkably often that figure turns out to come from somebody selling you something.

Want the foundation in place first? That's in the online visibility basics, and the technical side I describe under SEO and AI visibility. Work across borders sits under marketing localization, because it's rarely only about language.

Where this stops

This is about getting found, and that's one part of a marketing strategy. Whether your offer matches what Norwegian customers want, what it should cost and how you deliver it: getting found says nothing about any of that.

A Dutch company that doesn't land in Norway is more often dealing with an offer problem than a visibility problem. Getting found better then mainly means more people get to say no.

Working in both markets?

Send me your website and the market you want to move into. I'll tell you honestly whether getting found is your bottleneck or whether something else is going on.

Dominique@framvekst.no

You'll hear back within three business days.

See my contact details